Some Porn Hard to Distinguish from Training for Pedophiles (explicit language)

Robert Jensen and Gail Dines discuss the weak boundaries between some legal pornography and depictions of pedophilia in “The Content of Mass-Marketed Pornography”, from Pornography: The Production and Consumption of Inequality (1998, p.87-89).

A subgenre of pornography sexualizes differences in age. Because of strict laws banning child pornography, actual children are almost never used in commercial pornography sold above ground. But videos are available that highlight the differences in ages between adults (such as women in their 20s and men over 50) or that use such markers as clothing and hair styles to portray adult women as children…

[A] scene in Senior Stimulation involved a man who appeared to be in his 50s coming into the bedroom of a woman who appeared to be in her 20s, but was dressed as a teenager in a child’s dress, saddle shoes, and hair barrettes. When the man determined that the book she was reading is about fish, he begins a conversation about checking her vagina, which he called her “fish tank”…

The woman in that scene was clearly an adult, but the intent was the sexualization of an adult-child relationship. This strategy was the basis for the video Cherry Poppers Vol. 10. Four of the five scenes were sex between different women who appeared to be in their 20s and “Max”, who appeared to be in his 40s… The fifth scene used a different man who looked to be in his 30s. Each of the women dressed in a child’s uniform: some combination of bows in the hair, pigtails, either short socks or knee socks, saddle shoes, frilly dresses, or school uniforms. These women also had smaller breasts and were more slightly built than is typical in pornography. The scenarios had Max providing the woman/girl with her first sexual experience. A detailed description of one of the vignettes shows how this video not only depicted child-adult sex, but offered realistic, detailed instructions on how to initiate a child into sex, a manual for how to perpetrate a sexual assault on a child.

In this scene, the girl went into a house, where she called out for her older sister. Max entered the house shortly after her, also looking for the sister. After he found the girl in her sister’s bedroom snooping into her sister’s possessions, Max said that if the girl was good to him, he would not tell the sister about her snooping. Acting confused, as one would expect a child to be in such a situation, the girl is told by Max that he would “show you what boys like” but that they would have to be careful because if the sister found them, “She’ll get mad.”

Max then showed the girl how to fondle his penis, instructing her to “give it a little kiss, don’t be afraid, suck it. Just like a sucker, just like a lollipop…” He also showed her how to produce enough saliva to make the oral sex pleasurable for him.

After he put her up on the sink and basin and shaved her pubic hair, Max penetrated her with his fingers before vaginal intercourse, something rapists of girls often find necessary in order to stretch the child’s vagina so that it can accept the penis. He then penetrated her anus with his fingers before anal intercourse. Although her facial expression suggested she was in pain, she said, “This is fun, mister…”

Throughout the sexual activity Max alternated gentle talk of her being a “good girl” with rougher reminders that she was a cunt. “Say it,” he demanded. “‘I’m a little cunt.’ Can you say ‘teenage  fuckmate’? Say it. Repeat it.” He told her how fun it was but reminded her not to tell her sister. He treated her as if she was his special friend, yet also spit in her mouth at one point. These are the standard strategies of a pedophile: alternating affection and abuse to leave the child confused, and telling the child that the sex is special but must be kept a secret from others.

In addition to the cues to age in the women’s appearance, they also “acted” like girls in these scenes. They were more passive than other women in pornography and had to be explicitly directed through sexual acts. The men in these scenes were more overtly controlling, moving the women’s heads and bodies to position them as they desire. The women were generally more quiet, not vocalizing moans of pleasure; they were more likely to giggle in a childish voice or be silent.

—————-
Movies sold by Capital Video and its affiliates include “Amateur Initiation 29”, “Bubble Gum Virgins”, “Early Entries #4”, “Forbidden Cherries”, “Home Schooled #3” and “It’s a Young Girls Thing”.

One thought on “Some Porn Hard to Distinguish from Training for Pedophiles (explicit language)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.