NoPornNorthampton aims to increase awareness about the impact of porn on people and communities. We support the reasonable regulation of sexually oriented businesses in Northampton,
Massachusetts and elsewhere. We ask businesspeople to balance profits with compassion. We do not advocate increasing government censorship of porn.
This site contains documentation that some people may find unpleasant. It is reproduced for the sole purpose of supporting NoPornNorthampton's arguments.
Porn is an important subject because the abuse of women and children is common in America, porn is a factor in this abuse, and porn is pervasive in our culture.
There are 500+ articles on this website--over half a million words of content--organized into categories (see our Category Archives below). Our critique of porn includes specific
legal strategies that you can employ to reduce the risk of secondary effects (crime, blight, harassment) that can surround adult enterprises. Ultimately we hope to reduce the demand for
porn by educating people about the impact it has on themselves and their relationships.
View Professor Gail Dines' March 2007 lecture on "Pornography and Pop Culture",
which describes the increasingly harsh misuse of women in modern pornography, and how the people, money and values of porn have entwined with mainstream media and corporations. This 62-minute
Google video (see our overview) is an excellent starting point for any discussion of feminism, media and porn.
Our Frequently Asked Questions section (see below) addresses concerns that can arise, such as First
Amendment issues.
To understand how narrow, violent, unloving and distorted porn's vision of sex generally is today, we encourage you to review this content analysis of 50 top selling porn films and these cartoons from Hustler, Playboy and Penthouse. Professor Diana Russell has also kindly permitted us to
make her book, Against Pornography, available as a free PDF download.
Dr. Russell presents the science and the raw material about porn so you can draw your own conclusions.
On this blog, we use the terms "adult business" and "sexually oriented business" interchangeably.
Email info@nopornnorthampton.org, write to NoPornNorthampton, 351 Pleasant Street, PMB 101, Northampton, MA 01060-3961, or call 413-320-2027. Please indicate if your comments should be kept private.
How to Send Comments
Please email your comments to info@nopornnorthampton.org. Please indicate if your comments should be kept private.
Support NoPornNorthampton
NoPornNorthampton is composed of local volunteers. Please help fund our efforts in publicity, education and research. Send a check payable to No Porn Northampton, 351 Pleasant Street,
PMB 101, Northampton, MA 01060, or make a secure donation online at Click & Pledge.
You may also send contributions via PayPal to info@nopornnorthampton.org.
NoPornNorthampton has received a Certificate for Solicitation from the Massachusetts Attorney General's Division of Public Charities, meaning we are permitted to raise funds from the public. We have
no intention or expectation of making a profit from our activism. Since some funds may support political activities, donations are not tax-deductible.
Some links for books go to Amazon, where we have an affiliate relationship. Any monies generated from these book sales will be contributed to NoPornNorthampton. The cost of your purchase is not
affected.
Capital Video calls itself "the largest adult retail chain in the nation." It does business as or is affiliated with Met-Cap Management, Amazing.net, and Metro Interactive.
Headquartered in Cranston, Rhode Island, Capital Video reported $25,000,000 in sales in 2006. The company was incorporated in 1979 by Kenneth Guarino. Dennis Nichols is the current President-CEO.
Capital Video has over 20 "branches" in the US, primarily in New England. These stores typically appear under the Amazing.net name and sell adult movies,
magazines and sexual paraphernalia. Many also have porn viewing booths. Stores close to Northampton include Springfield, MA,
Wethersfield, CT and Meriden, CT.
Kenneth Guarino has been convicted of conspiracy to evade taxes. Court documents also
describe how he paid at least $1.7 million in cash to Natale Richichi, a capo in the Gambino family, "to fend off extortion attempts and to assist Guarino with other business matters where Richichi's
influence as a capo might benefit Guarino."
A July 2006 Dun & Bradstreet report says that Guarino owns 100% of the capital stock. However, a June 2007 Dun & Bradstreet report says that Nichols owns 100% of the capital stock. While it's
possible that Guarino sold the company to Nichols, we have no information that confirms this. We have asked D&B to investigate the discrepancy. We are waiting for their reply.
The Valley Advocate is the major alternative weekly newspaper that serves Western Massachusetts. We call on them to fulfill their progressive mission--to look out for women and the
vulnerable--and drop ads for escort services and other commercial sex enterprises.
Strip Clubs And Wall Street
...These clubs are like wrecking balls to marriages and communities. The dancers work under abusive conditions. Drugs, disease and prostitution are prevalent, and the realities of sex trafficking
from Eastern Europe are not to be taken lightly.
About "Secondary Effects"
Here are posts on our blog that give particular attention to the "secondary effects" of sexually oriented businesses. These effects include an increased risk of crime, disease, failure
of surrounding businesses, reduced property values, hazardous trash and harassment of passersby. These risks are the ones that motivate cities to enact zoning and health regulations on sexually
oriented businesses, and the reasons why courts uphold these regulations. Adult businesses aren't just about speech. They're about physical impacts on people and neighborhoods. That makes them a
public issue.
State Senator Stanley Rosenberg (D-Amherst): "I recognize the courts have upheld the Constitutional Rights of people to buy and sell these materials. The courts have also said governments have the right to regulate where such materials are sold."
We distinguish porn, which is generally harmful, from erotica, which can be harmless or even beneficial. The distinction is not absolute, but we suggest that erotica is that which supports love (examples), and porn is that which destroys love (examples).
Jill Manning writes, "While erotica has also been defined as literature or art intended to arouse sexual desire, it is distinguished from pornography in that it is void of violence, illegal portrayals (e.g., children), sexism, racism, and homophobia, and is respectful of the human beings involved."
An article in The Guardian suggests that porn is much more about power and domination than erotica is. An article in Writer's Digest suggests that porn is about masturbation, while erotica is about "sexual journeys ripe with character development". Hugo Schwyzer argues that porn is about having shallow experiences with lots of people, while eros is about having deep experiences with the same person.
Here are some characteristics we associate with porn:
mechanical
mindless
uncaring
exploitative
imbalance of power
lack of consent
taking without permission
selfish
careless
heedless
simplistic
shallow
objectifying
deceptive
cheating
violating
rough
harsh
inflicting pain
degrading
humiliating
unloving
actors not proud of product
actors disdain audience
Here are some characteristics we associate with erotica:
humane
mindful
caring
respectful
communicative
listening
consensual
balance of power
mutual pleasure
integrity
wholeness
sharing
thoughtful
deep feelings
loving
actors proud of product
actors respect audience
A complex work of art may have characteristics from both groups. It might be hard to apply a simple label to it. However, most porn is not that complex. You will not find much Henry Miller or Anais Nin in your typical porn shop.
While erotica may empower women, porn disempowers them. This is easy to see in the workplace, where porn has been used to harass and intimidate female coworkers.
Ultimately, the biggest difference between porn and erotica has to do with the long-term effect on the viewer, as well as the conditions under which the entertainment was made. By educating people as to the potential harms of adult materials, we hope they can look inside themselves to judge the healthiness of their media diet.
The following might be signs of unhealthy consumption of porn:
You feel guilty, ashamed, alienated, sad, confused, unsatisfied, or angry after viewing porn.
You're afraid other people might discover what you're watching.
You experience negative consequences at work from your consumption of porn, or you fear possible consequences.
You start looking at pretty people purely as sex objects that you'd like to possess.
You treat people the way you see people in pornography treated.
You become more hostile or aggressive toward other people in your life.
You find that you are becoming increasingly critical of other people's physical imperfections.
You find it stimulating when porn performers appear to be experiencing pain, or are crying.
You notice your relationships, particularly your intimate ones, becoming unstable, coarse and conflict-ridden.
You become dissatisfied with how your partner expresses himself or herself sexually.
You need to remember images or scenes from pornography in order to have sex with someone.
When you are having sex with someone, images or scenes you've seen in pornography "get in the way"--they come into your mind and won't go away, even if you want them to.
You find that you prefer spending time alone with porn, rather than engaging with a companion or attempting to find one.
You sense that you are not growing emotionally as time passes, that you are stuck in habits that are not very satisfying.
You find that you have to consume more and more porn, or more explicit and violent porn, to become stimulated.
--------
Clinician M. Douglas Reed offers further warning signs of porn addiction here.
--------
Robert Jensen offers these definitions of pornography in Pornography: The Production and Consumption of Inequality (p.3):
"Pornography is the material sold in pornography shops for the purpose of producing sexual arousal for mostly male customers... Second, from a critical feminist analysis, pornography is a specific kind of sexual material that mediates and helps maintain the sexual subordination of women."
Green sexuality is sustainable sexuality. It is characterized by long-term, mutually respectful relationships that enhance the lives of the lovers and the wider world. Green
relationships look more like erotica and less like porn, as defined above. Green sexuality is a union between two equals, embracing both heterosexual and homosexual bonds but
excluding polygamy, adult-child sexual relations and bestiality.
Green relationships are mindful of the impact of sexual choices on physical and mental health. They value integrity, wholeness and communication and avoid exploitation, abuse, promiscuity,
infidelity and prostitution.
Green sexuality is consistent with the principles of the larger green movement, emphasizing long-term thinking, respect for other people, and an awareness of the consequences of personal choices.
The green lover avoids mindless excess. By giving up superficial, fleeting, unsatisfying experiences, green relationships cultivate a finer, deeper, richer, and more robust way of living.
These articles illustrate aspects of green sexuality, or demonstrate the hazards when its attitudes are not present...
Healthy Sexual Behavior
Mutual consent (free will)
Behavior is a want or desire
Fulfilling, enhancing, mood stabilizing
Personal interchange of emotion
Rare negative consequences
Enhanced self-worth
Sexual behavior is fulfilling, satiating
Balanced sexual behavior
Addictive Sexual Behavior
Coercion, victimization, and force
Behavior is a compulsion for instant gratification
Associated with severe mood shifts
Impersonal and emotional detachment
Negative consequences
Negative self-worth, shame, guilt
Lack of satiation, tolerance
Erratic sexual behaviors (excessive vs. anorexic)
__________
Coleman-Kennedy, C. & Pendley, A. (2002). Assessment and diagnosis of sexual addiction. Journal of the
American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 8(5), 143–151.
U.S. News & World Report (2/10/97): "There is a constant demand for new talent, and few actresses last more than a year or two... Checks sometimes bounce. The borderline legal status of the industry
makes performers reluctant to seek redress in court..."
Strip Clubs: Dancers Pay to Work There
...the girls who work there, the dancers...pay $150 to $200 a shift for the privilege of working... I asked one guy in the business, "What's the biggest risk to your business model?" He said if the
government stops immigration from Eastern Europe.
Kara Nox, adult film star, on "What don't you like about porn?"
A: ...Mostly, it's the attitude among many men that I'm subhuman. The degradation of women is getting worse. Conditions for women on set are becoming more and more dangerous. As porn grows, more men
with Neanderthalean views of women are getting power as talent, and producers. The results are increased acceptance of violence onset. Women face enough danger outside of porn. It seems as though
many of the men we fear are now doing porn, and they legitimize their misogyny by saying it's for entertainment value. That scares the shit out of me, because it means there are even more troglodytes
watching this, and getting off on women being hurt.
The profits from porn movies and phone sex flow through several
"blue-chip" American corporations. These include Holiday Inn,
Marriott, AOL Time Warner, Comcast, EchoStar Communications,
DirecTV, Adelphia, Cox Communications, Charter Communications,
Cablevision Systems and AT&T. If you own shares in these
companies, you might consider discussing the matter with their
shareholder relations departments, or simply selling their
shares.
Status of Northampton Ordinances Regarding Sexually Oriented Businesses
View and search Northampton's current municipal code online here.
On November 2, 2006, the Northampton City Council approved ordinances that regulate signage with adult content (PDF) and require that establishments with porn viewing booths must be located in Northampton's Highway Business District and be at least 500 feet from homes, schools and houses of worship. In addition, a business with over 1,000 square feet of adult material on display must also be located in the Highway Business District and be at least 500 feet away from homes, schools and houses of worship. See more about the ordinances regarding size and location of adult businesses.See the Daily Hampshire Gazette's support for this legislation.
NoPornNorthampton also advocates the adoption of health regulations to ensure the safety and cleanliness of porn viewing booths, should any be established in Northampton. The city has not taken formal action on this as of yet.
Northampton Vote Tracker
See how your city officials are voting on adult-use zoning and matters relating to Capital Video:
On the satellite photos, observe the railroad tracks that run right behind 135 King Street. A bike trail is also planned to run beside the tracks (see PDF map). Presumably the bike trail will be used by many children. Many residents have expressed concern that a porn shop may attract prostitutes, drug dealers, and sexual predators to this area. The thick vegetation bordering the tracks provides many potential hiding places.
A quick check of Mapquest reveals that 135 King Street is less than a mile and a half from Exit 20 on I-91. People have expressed concern that porn consumers from around the region will converge on the King Street porn shop to avail themselves of the hardcore material to be sold there.
* There are an estimated 372 million porn web pages
* 12% of all websites are pornographic
* 266 new porn sites go online daily
* 25% of all search engine requests are porn related
* Sex is the most searched word on the Internet
* 35% of all Internet downloads are pornographic in nature
* 89% of porn is created in the US
* $2.84 billion in revenue was generated from US porn sites in 2006
* 72% of porn viewers are men
Are you advocating censorship? Why not let people choose the media they want to consume?
We are not advocating censorship. We don't want to establish any board of censors, nor do we want to see people arrested for consuming currently legal forms of porn. What we are trying to do
is to educate people, and demonstrate why they should exercise judgment and restraint on their own. We hope this will reduce the demand for porn, and induce businesspeople to think twice about making
money from suffering.
If people are going to make a choice, we want it to be an informed choice.
We do support modest zoning and health regulations for certain adult businesses to mitigate their well-known risks to the surrounding community (see About "Secondary Effects" above). These
regulations are no more strict than those found elsewhere in America. Capital Video, and the porn industry as a whole, have left a highly visible trail of tears in their wake. Must we repeat the miserable experience of other people and other towns with regulations that are
too lax?
Some people argue that the reasonable regulation of an activity is tantamount to banning it. This is absurd. The government regulates many activities, including many kinds of speech. The government regulates the gasoline you can
put in your car. Does that mean it really wants to ban gasoline or the act of driving? It regulates the disposal of toxic waste. Does that mean it wants to ban toxic waste or all the activities that
produce it? It regulates the time, place and manner in which businesses may serve alcohol. Does that mean it wants to ban drinking?
Nadine Strossen, president of the American Civil Liberties Union, has been at the forefront of those who equate anti-pornography with censorship. Diana Russell rebuts Strossen's arguments here.
You just want to roll society back to the way things were in the 1950s, or maybe the 1650s, don't you?
No. The sexual revolution and other developments since the 1950s have brought important gains, such as more opportunities for women and more rights and respect for the GLBT community. At the same
time, today's society has problems. Rates of divorce are persistently high, with troubling impacts on children. Rates of sexually transmitted disease are "a
major public health challenge". About one-half of all pregnancies are unintended. Rates of domestic violence and child sexual abuse are high. Domestic violence and sex crimes go
unreported on a large scale.
We don't want to roll back the clock and give up the changes that were good. We want to preserve these gains while moving forward to address the current problems. Porn is part of what's holding our
society back. It portrays sexuality in a way that generally ignores the problems and risks or
even makes fun of them. The messages of
porn can and should be countered with more complete and accurate information about
sexuality and relationships.
We appreciate that there is a long-standing romantic vision that if we can
only dispense with all 'unnatural' social restraints, a sexual utopia will envelop the world. Unfortunately, the reality is when you dispense with all restraints, the strong come to oppress the weak.
This is exactly what we're witnessing between porn producers and performers, between porn shops and communities, and between porn viewers
and victims.
The wisdom lies in deciding which social restraints to loosen, which to leave alone, and which to strengthen, not in abandoning them altogether.
By the way, Northampton's Puritans had a lot more sex than you might think.
Some women watch or make porn. Doesn't that mean that porn is harmless to women, or even liberating?
Being stimulated by or profiting from the subjection of others is a common human failing, and some women are seduced by it. "Madams", for example, have been around for a long time. Other women believe that a
callous attitude shows that they are as tough as men, that they can compete in a man's world. This phenomenon is
explored in Female Chauvinist Pigs.
That said, the substantial majority of today's porn viewers are men. 36.9 percent of the respondents to a Ball
State University survey (2004-2005) acknowledged visiting a porn site within the last month or more frequently. The percentages were 49 percent among men, and only 17 percent among women. Internet Filter Review finds that of the 10% of adults who admit to Internet sexual addiction, only 28% of these are women. A 2005 article from
MediaPost elaborates on the size and composition of the online audience for porn.
While we agree it is possible to make egalitarian erotica, today's porn is overwhelmingly about domination and abuse, even when the director is female. The target of this abuse is usually a
woman. Read about one woman's journey out of watching porn, as she realized it was a cheap way of
making herself feel good at the expense of others.
The First Amendment has only three exceptions: obscenity, libel, and speech that causes immediate harm. Any other restriction on speech, no matter how slight, is impermissible censorship, is
it not?
The First Amendment is worthy of high respect, but the courts recognize many more exceptions than is commonly realized. For example, many regulations cover commercial speech, there are rules governing where you can
"electioneer" on Election Day, and it is illegal to possess child porn. In the latter case, the Supreme Court holds that the value of child porn is so small, and the benefits of suppressing it are so
great, that it is acceptable to censor it. Even the ACLU supports this position, at least when actual children are involved. We encourage you to read the court's detailed reasoning.
What do you have to say to claims that porn is cathartic, that it actually reduces the incidence of rape?
The balance of the evidence (scientific studies, personal testimony) suggests to us that porn in fact stimulates rape and confuses people about what's acceptable behavior (such as whether to take no
for an answer during sex). We explore these issues in greater detail here.
The harms of porn are illusory. Wouldn't it be more accurate to say the harm stems from the stigma and shame surrounding porn?
Sometimes shame and stigma are unwarranted and toxic, but sometimes they are valuable signals that something is wrong. The stigma surrounding porn reflects people's understandable
aversion to the sexism, racism, exploitation, abuse,
disease, crime and blight that are associated with porn and adult enterprises. The key is assigning shame and stigma
to where they belong--the oppressor, not the victim.
In 1983, Robin Morgan reported that "[T]he work of Dr. Natalie
Shainess (psychiatrist of New York) and Dr. Frank Osanka [sic] (psychologist and child-abuse specialist, Chicago) show that convicted rapists who, even five to seven years ago, expressed remorse
about their acts of violence, recently show no such remorse and often cite as a reason for their guiltlessness that 'everyone knows women want to be raped; all the porn stuff proves that.'"
When shame and stigma restrain someone from harming another, that strikes us as healthy and appropriate. It is dangerous for porn to erode the sense of shame felt by abusers and sexual predators.
Examples of this at work are the cartoons of
Hustler, which frame abuse as entertainment, something not to be taken seriously.
You say porn harms, but are you really just saying porn offends you?
The harm is real whether or not a particular person finds porn offensive. Rebecca Whisnant clarifies the distinction between offensiveness and harm in "Confronting pornography: Some conceptual
basics" (p.22, see our review of this article):
Offense, we have repeatedly stressed, is a way of feeling bad, which can usually be avoided or ended by avoiding the stimulus that triggers the bad feeling... Harm is different. It is an objective
condition, not a way of feeling; to be harmed is to have one's interests set back, to be made worse off... Whether a person is harmed or not does not depend on how she feels. In fact, she can be
harmed without even knowing about it--say, by having vicious lies about her spread behind her back, thus damaging her reputation and diminishing her opportunities. In contrast, no one can be offended
without knowing about it, because offense is something that happens in one's head.
Feminists have claimed that the mass production and consumption of pornography harms women in general--by contributing to violence and discrimination against women, and by conditioning its users to
respond sexually to women as inferiorized, fetishized objects who crave humiliation and degradation. We have also claimed that the pornography industry harms many, if not all, of the women who
participate in it. Coercion and abuse [are] rampant in this industry--from the literal enslavement often associated with international sex trafficking, to women and girls who get filmed without their
knowledge...
Being stimulated by porn comes naturally to many people, so why fight it?
It's true that humans are naturally endowed with plenty of 'animal' instincts. Of course, in the animal world, some species eat their young. In others, the dominant male drives off other
males so he can monopolize multiple females. Humans are not animals. They can choose other values.
David Mura writes, "Except when the term enters debates among Marxists, 'natural' is invariably
used to preclude any investigation of whether or not people in other societies or in other times may have behaved differently. In addition, it discourages any examination of whether or not certain
behavior is learned. In such instances 'natural' is not a step-by-step reasoned argument, it is an ideology. It is used to justify whatever is customary in a given society, to blind critical
discourse.
"In this particular case, the argument that pornography is 'natural' ignores the fact that there are men who have given up their obsession with pornography and who have not died."
Much of your evidence against porn and adult enterprises is based on correlation. How does that prove that they cause the ills you describe?
Wikipedia discusses the relation of correlation and causation at some length. It is true that some correlations are
illogical and false. Example: My failure to take an umbrella to work on cloudy days always causes rain. However, our opposition generally raises this issue as a rhetorical dodge to avoid engaging with the logical connections and
evidence we present. Edward Tufte, an expert in statistics and information design, puts it this way, "Correlation is not causation but it sure is a hint."
At this point, the onus is on our opposition to suggest alternate explanations for the impact of porn and the
secondary effects of adult enterprises, and to back this up with evidence and not armchair speculation. It would give them credibility to acknowledge that
neighborhood blight and abusive behavior are serious problems and, even if they are not
ready to concede that porn is a cause of abusive behaviors, that porn is supportive of them. All too often we simply sense despair from the other side that things can be made better.
Not everyone who smokes will get lung cancer, but today most people accept that smoking is a cause of lung cancer, despite decades of denials by cigarette manufacturers. In this light, consider the
words of researcher Edward Donnerstein: "The relationship between particularly sexually violent images in the media and subsequent aggression...is
much stronger statistically than the relationship between smoking and lung cancer."
A mark of being human is having some free will and unpredictability, so theories about human behavior will never be as tightly provable as propositions in geometry. There will always be outliers and
exceptions. However, this does not mean we should abandon the